LIVE
...

Follow us on

News

NBA superstar could pick Chelsea or Tottenham as Daniel Levy and Todd Boehly hold part-takeover talks

When it comes to sports investment projects, it doesn’t get much more big-time than Chelsea and Tottenham – two clubs who are potentially in line for ownership shake-ups in the near term.

Both clubs feature in top 10 most valuable footbal🎉l clubs in the world, with their London locations and global reach major factors for their multi-billion dollar appraisals.

RankTeamLeagueCountryCurrent valueOne-year value change (%)Revenue ($m)Operating income ($m)
1Real MadridSpanish La LigaSpain6.6987376
2Manchester UnitedEnglish Premier LeagueEngland6.559785187
3BarcelonaSpanish La LigaSpain5.62840-145
4LiverpoolEnglish Premier LeagueEngland5.372719102
5Manchester CityEnglish Premier LeagueEngland5.12869147
6Bayern MunichGerman BundesligaGermany5378184
7Paris Saint-GermainFrench Ligue 1France4.44754-126
8Tottenham HotspurEnglish Premier LeagueEngland3.214665161
9ChelseaEnglish Premier LeagueEngland3.1316200
10ArsenalEnglish Premier LeagueEngland2.615560140

At Spurs, Daniel Levy has beꦑen courting fresh investment for some time,ꦬ although the chairman and co-owner only formally announced his intentions in April.

The former Newcastle United supremo Amanda Staveley is explori🗹ng Tottenham with a view to a potential investment on behalf of a con🌼sortium of backers from the Unit🧜ed States and Middle East.

Levy and ENIC are beli🦋eved t🌠o be seeking fresh capital from a minority partner in order to fund infrastructure projects and, the current ownership says, investment in Ange Postecoglou’s playing squad.

Diagram showing the ownership structure of Tottenham, including Daniel Levy, the discretionary trust benefitting the family of Joe Lewis, ENIC, and 30,000 other Spurs investors

Chelsea’s situation is slightly more complex, with Todd Boehly anꦐd Behdad Eghbali at loggerheads in the boardroom and having reportedly held talks about buying each other out.

There is no clear path to a major cha🅷nge of their corporate structure, however.

As a minority investor, Boehly has no lever to force a full takeover, while any bid for the equity owned by Clearlake Capital would need to represent a healthy return on the £1.5bn tꩵhey paid for their stake.

From Eghbali’s point of view, there is little reason to buy Boehly out as they already have operational control at Stamford Bridge as as the club’s majority owneꦅrs.

And in any case, the owners may be reluctant to do anything to upset the momentum that Chelsea have built up on the pitch under Enzo Maresca.

Diagram showing the ownership structure of Chelsea, including Clearlake Capital, Todd Boehly, Behdad Eghbali, Jose Feliciano and others.

When equity in either club eventually changes ꦺhands, it will guarantee the selling party a huge profit on their initial investment.

Why? Because the enterprise values of Premier League clubs have skyrocketed in recent years.

The reasons are multi-faceted.

The extraordinary growth of the league’s broadcast revenue is the single biggest fact⛎or, but growing interest in clubs’ IP𝓡 and global appeal is arguably next in line.

In layman’s terms, investors know that clubs like Chelsea and Tottenham have phenomenal potential as vehicles to sell produ𓄧cts and se🥃rvices to a mass market.

Photo by Alex Pantling - The FA/The FA via Getty Images
Photo by Alex Pantling – The FA/The FA via Getty Images

It is the kind of languageꦍ that bedrock supporters justifiably ᩚᩚᩚᩚᩚᩚ⁤⁤⁤⁤ᩚ⁤⁤⁤⁤ᩚ⁤⁤⁤⁤ᩚ𒀱ᩚᩚᩚdetest.

But the era of the vanity owner who would buy a club pu🍰rely to deliver on-field glory is all but over, and investors are now looking at ROI as the number-one metric for success.

As it happens, the next big commercial moment in English football is on the horizon – but will it unfold in N17 or SꦫW6?

Nike’s Air Jordan brand to sponsor Chelsea or Tottenham

Both Chelsea and Spurs’ biggest individual deals are with Nike.

The headline figures suggest that the A🐼merican sportswear giants pay £60m and £30m respectively for the rights to manufacture the London clubs’ kits.

In reality, the mechanics and intricacies of the two deals mean the discrepancy between those two figures 🦹will be more modest.

Photo by Visionhaus/Getty Images
Photo by Visionhaus/Getty Images

The fact that spin-off brand Air Jordan, the brainchild of NBA legend Michael Jordan, is considering both clubs for its next collaboration is further evidence that Nike value both Spurs and Chelsea equ♎ally.

As reported by football finance expert Łukasz Bączek,𓆏 Champions League qualification could be key in determining which London club will be the next to get the Air Jordan treatment.

At present, Chelsea – who beat Aston Villa 3-0 on Sunday – are well ahead in those stakes.

They are five points clear of 7th-place Spurs and have identical records with 2nd-place Arsena🅘l🐲.

Position Team Played MP Won W Drawn D Lost L For GF Against GA Diff GD Points Pts
1 LiverpoolLiverpool13 11 1 1 26 8 18 34
2 ArsenalArsenal13 7 4 2 26 14 12 25
3 ChelseaChelsea13 7 4 2 26 14 12 25
4 BrightonBrighton13 6 5 2 22 17 5 23
5 Man CityManchester City13 7 2 4 22 19 3 23
6 Nottm ForestNottingham Forest13 6 4 3 16 13 3 22
7 TottenhamTottenham13 6 2 5 28 14 14 20

The Paris Saint-Germain revolution: Air Jordan deal could super-size Spurs or Chelsea’s enterprise values

If Nike, alongside Jordan and his advisors, do pick Spurs or Chelsea as their next brand-building project, it could be transfo🔥rmative in the commercial department.

That in 🍌turn could have a real, material impact on the enterprise values of either clubs and, as a result, the current part-takeover talks taking place in both boardrooms.

At Paris Saint-Germain, who have been partnered with Air Jordan since 2018, the club’s commercia💖l chiefs have credited the partnership with turning them into a lifestyle brand.

Photo by Kristian Skeie - UEFA/UEFA via Getty Images
Photo by Kristian Skeie – UEFA/UEFA via Getty Images

In essence, that🦂 means that their appeal as a merchandiser has extended well beyond fans of the club, which ultimately is a relatively limited pool, and into the wider streetwear market.

The effect would likely be more modest at Spurs or Chelsea given that they are s𝓰tarting from a higher base than the 12-time Ligue 1 champions, but it would amplify their brands all the same.

It may even eꦉxplain why Spurs have created a new ‘brand identity’, introducing a new logo-style crest that they will use on certain products. It would be more marketable for a streetwear brand.

Similarly, it has been mooted that Chelsea’s ki🦩ts next season♓ could feature their old, pre-2005 badge.